An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      This study examined the roles of the phonological working memory and the central executive in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test by altering the materials and the procedure of the task and using a dual-task design, in which cognitive abilities of normal participants were manipulated by performance of the secondary tasks selectively taxing the phonological loop or the central executive. The present study used three novel versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, namely the WCST-4 stimuli, the WCST-12-stimuli, and the WCST-12-stimuli-box, in all of which the participants were given the exact sorting criterion. So the tasks did not involve processes such as maintenance of inferences about the sorting criterion which would require phonological memory load. However, the tasks were assumed to require the executive process of response inhibition. In the WCST-4-stimuli condition no change was made to the WCST materials. In the other two conditions, relying on the assumption that the three-dimensional nature of the cards triggers inappropriate responses, unidimensional stimulus cards were used instead of the four normal three-dimensional WCST stimulus cards. The difference between these two conditions was that, in the WCST-12-stimuli-box condition, boxes were used to conceal the response cards previously sorted. The results supported Dunbar and Sussman's (1995) argument that some executive processes in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test require the use of phonological store, and the present design was able to differentiate the type of executive functions that do not involve the use of a phonological loop from the ones that do. In addition, the results concerning manipulations of the visual aspects of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test suggest that the three-dimensional nature of the WCST stimulus cards leads to an increase in the number of inappropriate responses produced with the executive secondary task interference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Istanbul University, Turkey
    • ISSN:
      0965-8211
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/09658210143000399
    • Accession Number:
      7066928
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      CINAN, S.; TANÖR, Ö. Ö. An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Memory, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 4, p. 277–289, 2002. DOI 10.1080/09658210143000399. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=7066928&custid=s6224580. Acesso em: 23 fev. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Cinan S, Tanör ÖÖ. An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Memory. 2002;10(4):277-289. doi:10.1080/09658210143000399.
    • APA:
      Cinan, S., & Tanör, Ö. Ö. (2002). An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Memory, 10(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000399
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Cinan, Sevtap, and Öget Öktem Tanör. 2002. “An Attempt to Discriminate Different Types of Executive Functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.” Memory 10 (4): 277–89. doi:10.1080/09658210143000399.
    • Harvard:
      Cinan, S. and Tanör, Ö. Ö. (2002) ‘An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test’, Memory, 10(4), pp. 277–289. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000399.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Cinan, S & Tanör, ÖÖ 2002, ‘An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test’, Memory, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 277–289, viewed 23 February 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Cinan, Sevtap, and Öget Öktem Tanör. “An Attempt to Discriminate Different Types of Executive Functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.” Memory, vol. 10, no. 4, July 2002, pp. 277–289. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/09658210143000399.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Cinan, Sevtap, and Öget Öktem Tanör. “An Attempt to Discriminate Different Types of Executive Functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.” Memory 10, no. 4 (July 2002): 277–89. doi:10.1080/09658210143000399.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Cinan S, Tanör ÖÖ. An attempt to discriminate different types of executive functions in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Memory [Internet]. 2002 Jul [cited 2020 Feb 23];10(4):277–89. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=7066928&custid=s6224580