SOUND PRINCIPLES, UNDESIRABLE OUTCOMES: JUSTICE SCALIA'S PARADOXICAL EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
  Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The article discusses the views of the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia regarding a proportionality principle in the Eighth Amendment to America's Constitution and prisoners' rights claims, and it mentions Scalia's jurisprudence and attitudes towards criminal sanctions. Various criminal law cases are examined, including Trop v. Dulles, Weems v. United States, and Robinson v. California. Litigation involving cruel and unusual punishment claims is assessed.
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Swinburne University, School of Law, Melbourne
      2Dean of the Deakin Law School, Melbourne
    • ISSN:
      0002-371X
    • Accession Number:
      124409114
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      BAGARIC, M.; GOPALAN, S. Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence. Akron Law Review, [s. l.], v. 50, n. 2, p. 301–351, 2017. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Bagaric M, Gopalan S. Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence. Akron Law Review. 2017;50(2):301-351. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580. Accessed January 28, 2020.
    • APA:
      Bagaric, M., & Gopalan, S. (2017). Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence. Akron Law Review, 50(2), 301–351. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Bagaric, Mirko, and Sandeep Gopalan. 2017. “Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence.” Akron Law Review 50 (2): 301–51. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580.
    • Harvard:
      Bagaric, M. and Gopalan, S. (2017) ‘Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence’, Akron Law Review, 50(2), pp. 301–351. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580 (Accessed: 28 January 2020).
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Bagaric, M & Gopalan, S 2017, ‘Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence’, Akron Law Review, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 301–351, viewed 28 January 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Bagaric, Mirko, and Sandeep Gopalan. “Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence.” Akron Law Review, vol. 50, no. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 301–351. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Bagaric, Mirko, and Sandeep Gopalan. “Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence.” Akron Law Review 50, no. 2 (April 2017): 301–51. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Bagaric M, Gopalan S. Sound Principles, Undesirable Outcomes: Justice Scalia’s Paradoxical Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence. Akron Law Review [Internet]. 2017 Apr [cited 2020 Jan 28];50(2):301–51. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=124409114&custid=s6224580