The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
  Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      "The question now to be faced is whether American society has reached a point where abolition is not dependent on a successful grass roots movement in particular jurisdictions, but is demanded by the Eighth Amendment." Justice Thurgood Marshall posed this question in 1972, in his concurring opinion in the landmark case of Furman v. Georgia, which halted executions nationwide. Four years later, in Gregg v. Georgia, a majority of the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative. Now, 40 years after Gregg, the question is being asked once more. But this time seems different. That is because, for the first time in our Nation's history, the answer is likely to be yes. The Supreme Court, with Justice Kennedy at its helm, is poised to declare the death penalty unconstitutional. No matter what the Court's answer, one thing is certain: dignity will figure prominently in its decision. Dignity's doctrinal significance has been much discussed in recent years, thanks in large part to the Supreme Court's watershed decisions in United States v. Windsor and Obergefell v. Hodges, which struck down laws prohibiting same-sex marriage as a deprivation of same-sex couples' dignity under the Fourteenth Amendment. Few, however, have examined dignity as a unifying principle under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments--which have long shared a commitment to dignity--and under the Court's LGBT rights and death penalty jurisprudence, in particular, which give substance to this commitment. That is the aim of this Article. This Article suggests that dignity embodies three primary concerns--liberty, equality, and life. The triumph of LGBT rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and the persistence of the death penalty under the Eighth Amendment expose a tension in dignity doctrine: the most basic aspect of dignity (life) receives the least protection under the law. Because dignity doctrine demands liberty and equality for LGBT people, it must also demand an end to the death penalty. If dignity means anything, it must mean this. In anticipation of the Court's invalidation of the death penalty on dignity grounds, this Article offers a framework to guide the Court, drawn from federal and state supreme court death penalty decisions new and old, statistics detailing the death penalty's record decline in recent years, and the Court's recent LGBT rights jurisprudence. It also responds to several likely counterarguments and considers abolition's important implications for dignity doctrine under the Eighth Amendment and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Iowa Law Review is the property of University of Iowa, College of Law, Iowa Law Review and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1Professor, Quinnipiac University School of Law
    • ISSN:
      0021-0552
    • Accession Number:
      120975109
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      BARRY, K. The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses. Iowa Law Review, [s. l.], v. 102, n. 2, p. 383–444, 2017. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580. Acesso em: 13 dez. 2019.
    • AMA:
      Barry K. The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses. Iowa Law Review. 2017;102(2):383-444. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580. Accessed December 13, 2019.
    • APA:
      Barry, K. (2017). The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses. Iowa Law Review, 102(2), 383–444. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Barry, Kevin. 2017. “The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses.” Iowa Law Review 102 (2): 383–444. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580.
    • Harvard:
      Barry, K. (2017) ‘The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses’, Iowa Law Review, 102(2), pp. 383–444. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580 (Accessed: 13 December 2019).
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Barry, K 2017, ‘The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses’, Iowa Law Review, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 383–444, viewed 13 December 2019, .
    • MLA:
      Barry, Kevin. “The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses.” Iowa Law Review, vol. 102, no. 2, Jan. 2017, pp. 383–444. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Barry, Kevin. “The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses.” Iowa Law Review 102, no. 2 (January 2017): 383–444. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Barry K. The Death Penalty & the Dignity Clauses. Iowa Law Review [Internet]. 2017 Jan [cited 2019 Dec 13];102(2):383–444. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=120975109&custid=s6224580